Cited risk scoring
Policy, origin, and counterparty factors score with visible source breakdowns for each material assumption.
Method
Deterministic + cited
Financial & strategic buyers
Ophanim for capital
Funds, DFIs, and strategic buyers get corridor and counterparty risk structured for IC packs — with citations that survive audit, LP questions, and post-close monitoring.
Policy, origin, and counterparty factors score with visible source breakdowns for each material assumption.
Method
Deterministic + cited
Screen mines, processors, and trade paths against the regimes that can reprice an investment thesis overnight.
Lens
Project + path risk
Keep portfolio companies and offtake structures under continuous watch instead of annual refresh memos.
Cadence
Ongoing event scores
What sets us apart
When risk changes, re-run scores against the same framework instead of commissioning a new narrative from scratch.
One source of corridor truth for deal teams, credit, ESG, and legal — with disagreements on interpretation, not on base facts.
See whether contractual origin and process claims are measurable in operations, not aspirational in paper.
Cited trails match the documentation depth public and development capital require.
Inside the platform
From screen to hold period: scores, events, and source packs that travel with the investment file.
View productsFAQ
No. It structures regulatory and corridor risk that technical and financial DD often under-specify — complementary, not a geology or cash-flow model.
Yes. Produce redacted score summaries with retained source trails on the GP side where confidentiality requires it.
Light operating integrations or periodic artifact pulls keep monitoring honest without a full system replacement.
Development through producing assets, offtake structures, trading desks, and strategic M&A into midstream and OEM-adjacent plays.
Ready when you are
Pick one live or recent corridor exposure. We’ll show score structure, sources, and monitor setup.
Request a demo