Hop-level route identity
Ports, handlers, and border crossings recorded against each shipment so disputes do not devolve into email archaeology.
Structure
Leg · node · regime
Trade & export corridors
Ophanim for trade corridors
Trade desks, ports, and export agencies get continuous views of corridor exposure: which legs, which jurisdictions, which policy rules can strand or re-price a cargo.
Ports, handlers, and border crossings recorded against each shipment so disputes do not devolve into email archaeology.
Structure
Leg · node · regime
Export controls, sanctions, and partner rules scored on the path — not only on origin country labels in a BL.
Risk
Path-aware scores
When a leg becomes high-risk, see which alternate corridor structures still satisfy buyer and regulator proof needs.
Action
Comparable path options
What sets us apart
Custody and regime risk do not stop at the mine gate — they live on every transfer and warehouse.
Shared passport and corridor views reduce handoff friction when title and responsibility change mid-route.
Documented paths and exceptions support higher-trust status with customs and border counterparts.
Policy shocks on a single port or land crossing surface against live bookings, not after demurrage starts.
Inside the platform
See active corridors, risk heat, and hop history without stitching TMS exports by hand.
View productsFAQ
No. Start from booking and milestone events you already track; deepen connectors as the programme matures.
Yes. Zones and temporary storage are first-class nodes so regime and custody context does not disappear in the grey zone.
Identity can be multi-party with scoped edits. The point is continuous path truth, not single-company capture.
Track-and-trace answers where. We also answer why a path is compliant or exposed, with citations to the rules that apply at each leg.
Ready when you are
Share origin, destination, and typical hands. We’ll sketch hop structure and the first policy heat map.
Request a demo